The Germanization of Christianity vs. The Christianization of Germans

That Christianity became “Germanized” or became Aryan in anyway is an entirely mistaken view of history. That Christian racialists would argue this in defense of Christianity, essentially admitting Christianity improved by becoming less Christian, is the height of hilarity. Indeed, if Aryans are so much more moral than Jews, why do they require Jewish Biblical works at all? Are they capable of only polishing the stone? Sexual innuendos intended.

Here, a dopey “Aryan pride” imagines illiterate barbarian kings and peasants rather than cosmopolitan, converting “Christians” and Jews translated Christian symbolism into something “Aryan.” It’s absurd on its face. Indeed, the “syncretism” of Christianity has been always Christians developing native forms in manners consistent to Christian symbolism as a means of conversion.

In other words, priests, and particularly a crypto-Jewish element, didn’t eventually approve of or “tolerate” Gothic cathedral, gargoyles, arboreal cathedral pillars, Arthurian legend, “Norse” Christmas trees, Mistletoe, Holly leaves, Easter eggs, Easter Bunnies and even the Swedish Lucia Light Festival. Rather they actively and intelligently developed these symbols as a charming bridge for conversion, as a means of JEM.

Is it even imaginable that such priests would tolerate the development of “unkosher symbols”?  This remains true even if, of course, they would naturally seek, in some unwise instances, to condemn such “harmless” idolatry. Here as well one imagines a subtle caducean conflict between intelligent Esotericists and uncreative, dogmatic Sussmen and Aryan Josephs.

By the same logic one claims Hollywood “Aryan” because of its use of Aryan faces and cowboy myths as a means of converting Americans to its ethos. Again, this does not discount the skill of some Aryan artists and even myth-makers, often operating instinctively or through inherited symbols they scarcely understood. Though to guess these Aryans set the direction or the finally meaning of it all, is woefully ignorant.

To fully understand this, think of the 60s Jewish comic book writer. He too is psychologically preparing an audience for “liberalism,” “multiculturalism” and, ultimately, through JEM, submission toward the “Jewish God.” Will this myth body of comic books be looked back upon as an Indo-European myth body, with all its Indo-European references, names and language?

Will “Jews,” who by then will have taken another name, be remembered as the Brahmin caste of priests of an “Aryan American Empire?” Will “Post-Jews,” going by a new name, secretly know what has occurred and know those men to have been their own ancestors? No. This will not occur. But only because of the return of Interpretatio Romana.