Garden of Eden Part III: Seth as Serpent Seed and Sargon of Akkad as Serpent

Seth is the “Serpent Seed”

The Bible appears to indicate Eve’s son, Seth, from which the Jewish line will eventually descend, as an offspring of her union with the serpent. We know this because Seth is almost certainly derived from the Semitic Egyptian god Set or Seth via “Promethean transmission.”

In ancient Greek, the language by which the Biblical parables officially entered non-Jewish societies, the Egyptian deity’s name was given as Sēth (Σήθ). There, in Greece, he was equated with the Serpentine Typhon, a form of the Jewish or proto-Jewish God. This is fitting, after all, in the Greco-Roman pantheon, Typhon, regarded as one of Jupiter’s fiercest enemies, was the son of the Jewish Saturn. Here it seems clearly suggested that Seth is descended from the Jewish God, whether Saturn or the Serpent in the Garden. This tends to suggest as well that the name Adam, indeed, is a reference to Saturn’s “adamantine” sickle as this study explores.

To be clear, my premise is distinct from a “Serpent Seed” premise held by some Christian sects that understands Cain as the descendant of the serpent. Though there are some interesting, potentially contradictory details of this tale, the JEM clearly indicates Cain as an Aryan figure as this study will explicate. Hence Genesis repeats a racial displacement theme with the Aryan Adam and Aryan Cain, the latter whom is doomed to wander the earth.

Sargon of Akkad as The Serpent

7fc26a6b77080176518c274f05ed4fbf.jpg
The tale of Sargon of Akkad, the first Semitic “King” on record, seems to tell the tale of the Garden from “the Serpent’s perspective.”

The tale of Sargon of Akkad, the first Semitic “King” on record, seems to tell the tale of the Garden from “the Serpent’s perspective.” Indeed, in the semi-mythical figure we find numerous similarities to Biblical figures that are reoccurring motifs in JEM. Like Christ, he was born of an illegitimate mother. Like Moses he appears to palace servants as a baby in a basket of rushes floating in a river. Like the Serpent of Eden, he infiltrates the royal garden or “garden of the gods” as a servant. There, like Christ, during his baptism, he is visited by a “Holy Spirit” or the Aryan Inanna or Ishtar appearing in a cloud of doves. Like King David, he gains access to kingship through “marrying in.”

To the extent he is understood as a historical figure, he is known for appointing his daughter, Enheduanna, as the high priestess of Nanna/Sin at Ur. In his mythical relationship with Ianna/Ishtar, he resembles Dumuzid, the clear first inspiration of Christ and the proto-Jewish Dying and Rising Cults that will follow. As a Semitic king presiding over cults like the cult of Nanna/Sin, which saw Aryan women made sacred prostitutes and breeding stock for Semitic kings, he also resembles Enlil, the Semitic father of Nanna/Sin. He was considered the great “ensi” or Lord of Enlil. Enlil, Dumuzid and Nanna/Sin may all be understood as proto-Jewish Gods, akin to Christ and Yawheh alike. These details are explicated in this study.

 

12 thoughts on “Garden of Eden Part III: Seth as Serpent Seed and Sargon of Akkad as Serpent

  1. Wow! Keep ‘em coming!

    This got me thinking about “Seth” in American History X, and I ended up on a tangent. But let me take an (amateur) crack at it.

    America History X (a Brahmin-woke take)

    This is an encoded, prescriptive Aryan-Christian “salvation” tale, depicting hidden Jewish protagonists, a cryptic Dionysus reference to proto-Christianity, and cuckoldry by the Jewish God.

    The Vinyard brothers are a clear Christian “duo”, with Derek and Danny serving as a sort of combined “Christ” figure, the subject of the films analysis.

    It is shocking on the realization that Derek (whose name means “leader of men”) is identified as a powerful, strong Aryan, the first born to his brother Daniel ( whose name, from the Torah, means “god is my judge”) a Jewish figure, smaller and weaker, and much more morally reflective.

    As such, here is a depiction of the eternal “battle” for the soul of European man, with the two brothers as an almost “split psyche” representing this struggle. (Incidentally, “Seth”, a serpent seed if there ever was one, plays a clearly significant role.)

    The “Dinner” Scene, is a terrifying confrontation, here we have the direct implication that Doris has been seduced by Murray, an obvious avatar of the Jewish God (this suspicion exists without the overt knowledge of the audience), cuckolding Derek’s father as per the Christ mythology.

    The meaning of Derek’s father however, whose name “Dennis”, an obvious reference to Dionysus, a proto-Christ figure, is unclear, and could be simply implying this “proto” esoteric connection, or (could be hinting at a true “structure” of the Christian trinity? Something else?) But the Dionysus reference is clear.

    Regardless, Derek, the Aryan “half” of European mans psyche rejects the Jewish God in his entirety in this scene, an action that ushers about his total downfall and ultimately the sacrifice of the son of God himself, (when Danny is executed in the final scene).

    In prison, derek is betrayed (obviously), and finally converted from his beliefs by “Lamont”, a clear Jewish figure, betrayed by his diminutive stature and his name, meaning “man of the law”.

    But by then of course the events had been set in motion, as always man must pay for his “sins”, as the redemption tale is completed and a thoroughly moralized European “Late Christian” stands at the ready.

    P.S. As a final note, the Cameron Alexander figure (“crooked nose” “the great”?) is possibly a reference to Jewish “controlled opposition”, but that’s getting a little conspiracy-ey even for me.

    Tfw u go so far down the rabbit hole u literally end up in a yeshiva

    Like

      1. Yeah, but possibly before too. Kaye is an Orthodox Jew, and after the Dionysus reference my ears pricked up.

        My theory here is that Danny is the cuckold son of Murray, the Jewish figure in the film. Check out the first scene with Principal Sweeney and Murray, when they’re talking about Doris. It’s implied that they got it on.

        If you think about it, it makes sense, as both characters fit the first/second born Esau/Jacob, Cain/Abel paradigm you propose. While Derek is a clear Germanic name. Combining this with the obvious Christian mythology, it seems Danny is Jewish.

        Like

  2. That sounds like a potentially sound thesis. I’ve certainly encountered this in numerous Jewish works. The reference to Dionysus in the father’s name may suggest him as a Proto-Jewish figure akin to Jacob, who becomes Aryan after wrestling the Jewish God and being renamed Israel. I explicate this closely in forthcoming writings.

    I would encourage you not to think of the Aryan figures as “Christ” figures, per se, as Christ is clearly a Jew and names referencing him, like Thomas, indicate Jews. You can think of Aryan figures, though, as sacrificial figures, representing consumable resource, rams, bread, wood etc. So the last name Vineyard suggests a soil or Garden for the Jewish vine or snake to plant its seed.

    If you want to write it up, I’ll take a look at it and (possibly with some editing) we can feature it on the blog. I’ll have to watch the film again and am pressed for time so I’ll wait until you send me something. It’s got to be tight. Make it an audit. Focus on symbols. Commentary has to be focused on not merely interpreting text but “translating” text as much as possible. No extraneous commentary, emotional reaction etc. We are familiar with Jewish behavior, the Bride Gathering phenomena and so forth so it doesn’t need to be expounded upon etc. Could be a good, popular article because that’s obviously a film that the Alt Right is interested in. If you get stumped on any name or symbol shoot me an email.

    Like

    1. I’ll keep at it. I write blogs on a wide variety of topics, but this has captured my attention in a way I doubt I’ll be able to shake for a while. It’s incredibly profound to see this “structural” mythic theme indicating cynical Jewish control of Gentiles. This stuff is everywhere you look once you get the basics. For reference, your “Rosemary’s Baby” analysis is excellent.

      To your point, yes, I already see that was an error, as “Danny” (Not the Germanic-monikered “Derek”), seems clearly to be the Christ figure – the Jewish son.

      BTW, just so you have some feedback, here’s how esoteric “troubleshooting” feels from a newcomer to your theory: “Derek” seems to be a Cain/Esau figure, to a Jewish “Danny”, who represents Christ… But were any of Christ’s siblings depicted like “Derek”? Seemingly not. So is Kaye “mixing” Jewish myths together? Is this on purpose, and is it even relevant? (And if not, why not, and since when!) This is, roughly, the type of block I’ve encountered as I’ve been trying to understand Jewish artwork. The semiotic “texture” seems incredibly “frayed at the ends”, to the uninitiated.

      Anyway, for AHX, the core structure of “JEM”/Anti-gentile esotericism seems to be there. I’ll be writing something up either way, but certainly feel free to use or investigate this idea in your material… as someone who has studied this so extensively, I feel you make much, much better sense of this symbol language than I do. I also think you are right that an analysis of AHX might “hit home” with a younger reader, moreso than Rosemary’s Baby, which while more sophisticated as a mythic template, is probably better known to The Boomer.

      Like

      1. Here’s the answer to the question that I think should make it clear. The names are ethnic identifiers. So the symbol language is elemental or “modular”. Don’t assume, for instance, that because one of the characters is named Daniel the artist is trying to retell the Book of Daniel. It’s merely identifying him as a Jew whom vis-a-vis the Aryan (or “Adam”) is the serpent. This will help you throw out a lot of the distractions in decoding these things. That Daniel dies in this film may suggest him as a Dying and Rising God but I’d have to look at the film to suss this out. Certainly it leads to Derek’s “conversion” to multiculturalism hence in that way he is Christ like. I think you’re on to this, I’d encourage you to pursue it. I am already working with another writer to apply the system to other works of JEM.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. Okay, that certainly clarifies that issue, thank you very much. One final, more specific question, if you have the time.

        Would “Dennis”, a name corresponding to Dionysus, always be understood as esoterically indicating a Jewish character? (In this instance, Derek’s ostensibly non-Jewish father who was murdered)

        Are there any exceptions, or “modifiers” of the main JEM archetypes that you think readers should be aware of?

        Like

  3. That would be the tendency as my study reveals Dionysus as a synonym of Yahweh and the wine-stained Judah, who keeps the donkey under a vine. You have to remember Jewish parables are puzzles so theoretically other clues could modify this. Off the top of my head, there might be a possessive sense to the name Dionysus, in other words, Dennis Vineyard may mean Dionysus’ Vineyard or the Jewish God’s vineyard which would indicate Dennis as resource. This could be a good theory that you could posit but see if you can confirm it based on other clues. But also see if there are other clues suggesting him as proto-Jew akin to Jacob. That he is a fireman by profession suggests him as an Aryan oppositional figure to a Jewish fire god. Be settled on this point and make a call saying “possibly” or “likely” depending on how good you feel about it. But you have to go over this with a comb. You’ll be pausing a lot, parsing dialog etc. It’s definitely a case of JEM, so its just a matter of unlocking. Good luck, son of Jupiter! This will undoubtedly be appreciated by the community. I’ll make a show on it if all goes well. We like to understand when we are being insulted and exactly how we are being insulted.

    Liked by 1 person

      1. Man oh man, I’ve been turning over stones for 3 days straight. You are not going to believe what I’ve found in this movie.

        (Consider also, the prior scene to the “Dennis Vinyard” flashback dinner, in which the Vinyard brothers tear down their racialist posters, revealing a freshly exposed *wooden wall* upon which they gaze hypnotically, right after tucking their gentile-indicated kid sister – Dennis’ surviving daughter – into bed.)

        I’ll brush it up, and upload it on a separate blog within a few days.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s