As the reader is aware, certainly there are clear prohibitions indicated against homosexuality in both the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament. We find these striking examples in Leviticus for example: “You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.” “If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon them.”  Here we find an over zealousness seeking credibility and leadership.
In the New Testament, Paul, in Romans, Corinthians and Timothy, condemns homosexuality. Homosexuals, along with adulterers, thieves, the greedy, drunkards and swindlers are to be excluded from the “kingdom of God.” It’s useful to remember here that Paul, in contrast to Peter, was considered an apostle especially to the Gentiles. Thus it is assumed as well he pandered to the concerns of these audiences.
Yet these condemnations should not be misunderstood. They are veil. They contradict scriptural JEM suggesting the practice of both homosexuality and pederasty. Perhaps on some level they may be considered “compromise” or even a kind of “syncretism of values.” It’s clearest, though, to understand these prohibitions as bait to sell a cult that unequivocally preaches and insinuates deracination, as this study discusses. Here, perhaps, expedition and speed is sought in bringing an Aryan flock to its knees before an Adonis and Bacchus-derived Jewish fertility.
Further these proclamations are proclamations on obvious points. Any person that sincerely wonders about the morality of such things as homosexuality, adultery or thievery is perhaps a person one should not seek to “save” or continue. Hence in a manner such cults tend to breed and attract the dumb and unsophisticated, the immoral, as well, as Nietzsche remarked. To wit people who require a heavenly reward to behave decently.
The ancients, including Celsus, whom we discuss in this study, had these sort of complaints about Christianity. No people in history have ever been confused about the “morality” on these basic matters. As to their actual behavior, it is dictated largely by their race as well as its leadership, whether Semitized, non-White or Aryan.
Again, Christianity and Judaism are sublimated Bacchus cults. Here one needs to simply imagine the contemporary Jewish “conservative” or “Neo-con.” With them, lip service is paid to “moral,” “conservative,” “traditional,” “constitutional,” “democratic” or “libertarian” values. Here a deracinated, piety cult forms to indicate Jews also as moral, including sexually moral. This makes theses cults salable. Here they are given an actual apparent function. Even Negroes appear in these cults as “moral,” “hardworking” “conservatives.” Hence they are even secretly and optimistically believed as capable of “reforming” non-Aryans.
The goal, now as then, is to offer placebo, to direct Aryans away from “false idols” or a racialist or Apollonian conclusion. It is the legalistic Ten Commandments in lieu of the Solar, Golden, Aryan “calf” or Apollo. Here a promotion of sexual propriety will appear only to the extent it is deemed necessary according to relative degrees of anti-Semitism. We assume this anti-Semitism, for instance, was extreme when Christianity was developed. In other words, from the Jewish perspective, the sexual piety that appears in Christianity, not to mention the anti-Semitism or anti- Pharisaism, was a “necessary evil” or a necessary veil. Again here we find The Caducean.
Yet is it even seriously imagined for a second that Jews are concerned at all about an increase of sexual immortality, degeneracy or homosexuality among their primary rival, Aryans? Would Jews have ever been concerned that their host was growing too soft or effeminate once they had gained access to them? Are the “conservatives” Ben Shapiro, David Frum and Alan Dershowitz concerned the society is becoming “too gay?” Again, myth, Religion and history only become coherent when we understand the “similarity of the ancients.”
That these Piety Cults hide in plain sight, under one’s nose, conforms perfectly with a general “chutzpah” one finds in JEM, where things are always subversive and often mean the opposite of what one is encouraged to guess. Hence with all three major faiths we find a Semitic Bride Gathering Cult that practices pederasty and homosexuality while posing as a “piety cult.” It’s the “perfect crime.” Only Jewry is this clever, only Jewry has this “chutzpah.”
This discussion on Homosexuality is continued here: Homosexuality Part IV: The Abrahamic Faiths as Sublimated Homosexuality Cults: The Serpent and the Heel
 Leviticus 18:22
 Leviticus 20:13
 Corinthians 6:9-10