The Christian humiliates himself with an appalling disclosure of ignorance when he claims that the Apollonian cares only about “flesh,” while he about “transcendent spirit.” “Spirit” is Aryan woman and genes, through symbolism, abstracted. By abstracted, again, we include a second sense of this verb abstract, which means “to draw or take away; remove” or “to steal.” Hence the flesh/spirit duality in Christianity, is different than the bread and wine or body and blood duality described at the Last Supper, which is explicated elsewhere in this study.
Both senses of flesh or body relate to the Aryan, but between the bread and wine we find a metaphor contrasting Aryan flesh and Jewish blood. As argued elsewhere, in the Last Supper metaphor, we find the wheat body of the Aryan Kore and the wine blood of Jewish or proto-Jewish Bacchus. In the Spirit and Flesh contrast, however, we find two riven Aryan elements, one feminine, the spirit, and one masculine, the flesh.
Indeed, the Greek word translated as “Flesh” in the New Testament and used in in contrast to spirit, is sarx, σάρξ, which may mean “flesh,” ”body,” but also, importantly, “kindred.” The English expression “flesh and blood” captures this sense.
At the Last Supper however the word for body is soma, σῶμα, which means more specifically “body” and “flesh” and is related, as a religious term, to the body of the Church, passive wife of the Jewish God. Hence in that context “body” might be understood as feminine.
As argued elsewhere in this study, “sarx,” kindred or race is inherently masculine. Hence the division of spirit and flesh appearing in the New Testament is not between carnality and goodness or faith, it is between Aryan man and Aryan woman. This is especially true as we understand Spirit as a fundamentally feminine element related to Eve and Psyche. Therefore the “evil flesh” in this duality operates esoterically as a symbol of Aryan man, Aryan race or Aryan kindred.
Indeed, the duality is designed to develop a division between the male and female Aryan elements, to demoralize, to create a sublimated fear of racial cuckoldry in the Aryan, to lead him to a hatred of his own “flesh” and to misdirect his energies in a pointless, repulsive, effeminate, “spiritual” direction. After all, when a man calls himself “spiritual” we should understand him as saying he identifies himself with the Goddess Psyche, likewise, as the Church, he makes himself the wife of a Jewish God.
Alternatively, he is consciously or unconsciously emitting a mating call to Psyche or the Aryan woman. One only an effeminate priestly Aryan, Jew or non-White can perform effectively. Philosophy or “Love of Sophia” has the same goal of seduction through “logos” or “profound” yammering. Sophia here, again, is a synonym of Psyche.
Here there is something profound in the idea that a man’s Psyche or “soul” is invisible, and this is integral to this doubtlessly Semitic metaphor. The Aryan woman has been stolen by the Semitic competitor, disappears. She is in the invisible Semitic underworld now. Christianity is developed to lead the woman away from “evil flesh” and natural and instinctual breeding drives toward Pluto’s Semitic underworld. This is why the Jewess Trivia, Pluto and Mercury’s attendant, is a Goddess of Spirits and Ghosts.
With Cupid it is possible now to return to the notion of the Semitic Mercury as soul guide, remembering as well that Mercury also represents “the thief.” Further it’s possible to understand the Jewish Biblical Apostles, Christ, Bacchus, Cupid and Jews more generally as Symbolic Synonyms of Mercury as this study establishes. With Mercury the goal is to break the Apollonian enclosure through the promotion of degeneracy so that he may poach the best among a dispersing flock. Hence we see rendered the Semitic Bride Gathering Cult where the Jewish Mercury thieves the flock of the Aryan Apollo.
This is why we develop a psychic enclosure and psychic weaponry through Art and Religion. This is why we re-establish Apollo as fertility God and the highest and most powerful God. This is why we combine in Apollo, the “assembly,” to lend the greatest gravitational and magnetic pull to this body. It is not for nostalgia, “larping” or to be “needlessly divisive.” It is to soberly unify, sift ourselves from the mad and damaged. It is to radically prioritize meaning. It is to survive, thrive and dominate unequivocally so that survival is never, ever a question again.
While we artists are obliged to make Art and Religion for men, lest they gradually lose all interest in society and their stake in it, we are also obliged especially to make Art and Religion for women and children and by it assign them ideal mating types. After all, they especially are “psychologically” directed by it. This is one of the great functions of beauty in Art. To be clear, I do not call us to pander any more than the successful seducer “panders.” Inferior Pan is the panderer. I call for beauty.
Regardless the metaphor of Psyche, by itself, is inoffensive so long as we understand Psyche paired with or desirous of an Aryan God such as Apollo or Mars. If men desire to use the word “Spirit,” they should understand its meaning. In salubrious usage it describes the defended and ameliorated Aryan Kore or womenfolk.
Who or What is Psyche?
In myth, Psyche was sought and wooed by the chthonic, nocturnal and Semitic figure Cupid or Eros, the so-called personification of erotic love. That Psyche was Aryan is beyond doubt. Indeed, the myths tell us even Venus was jealous of Psyche’ beauty, even if, in the end, we must regard the two as synonyms. The two come together especially in the symbol of the dove, particularly as it appears as the “Holy Spirit” at Jesus’ Baptism. The dove was an attribute of Venus. Again even, especially JEM confirms that beauty is the association one first makes with Aryans.
Cupid or Eros, for his part, was according to Hesiod, in his origin, a chthonic, primordial God. Likewise, in the Semitic Orphic and Eleusinian Mysteries, Cupid was second in age only to Night (Nyx), whom mothered him. There, the personification of erotic love, he was revered. Thus he might be understood as a rough synonym of Bacchus, Adonis and ultimately Christ, where eroticism is sublimated.
Indeed, the gnostic text, On the Origin of the World, for example, seems to conflate Adonis and Cupid by indicating the first rose formed by the union of Cupid and Psyche. Here it came from Psyche’s hymenal blood. Again, more generally this “explanatory myth” for the rose is understood as “Adonis’ myth.” Though the similarities between these two “beautiful,” “lover” gods are obvious.
To be sure, the Semitic character of Cupid remains true despite a possible Roman effort to Aryanize the Greek Eros in the person of Cupid. In Rome, Cupid was the son of Mars and Venus. Here, perhaps as a means of promoting the union of Mars and Venus, Romans were hoping to suggest “eroticism” or “love” results, particularly, from such a union. Hence perhaps the motive here was eugenic rather than subversive, even if the execution was clumsy, imperfect and ill-informed. Regardless, Cupid remains a fundamentally Semitic figure. Eventually, as the reader is aware, Cupid is depicted as a blind god, thus a god of promiscuity, of non-discernment, of “Cupidity.”
An account of Cupid and Psyche’s love affair survives primarily through Lucius Apuleius Madaurensis. There Cupid appears initially as a hidden God that Psyche is forbidden from looking upon, even whilst they are engaged in an erotic affair. Since a Delphic prophesy has indicated that Psyche will bear a dragon as an offspring that will grow to torment the world and the gods, she eventually fears that Cupid is also a monster of some type. When she violates the condition placed upon her and views him asleep in candle light, she discovers that he is beautiful and not a monster. The parable here is generally understood in modern interpretations as describing a “female sexual awakening.” Psyche is learning just “how beautiful the sexual experience can be.”
Here though, understanding that Psyche is intended as a metaphor for an inner essence or “soul,” we might interpret this as Psyche discovering “the true inner beauty” of the Semite. It conforms with and seems to establish a pattern in latter European folklore, such as appears in the “Beauty and The Beast” and “The Frog Prince,” where a formerly ugly or even monstrous suitor is revealed, in reality, to be a beautiful prince. Again, here, it appears, we find a metaphor for “inner beauty” which is discovered “once one gets to know someone.”
We are correct to question the eugenic value of such tales. To be clear, our heroes and idealized suitors should certainly be intelligent, brave and honorable as well as beautiful, to wit Apollonian. Yet we need “drama” to enthrall. Hence let drama and intrigue emerge from deceitful male suitors whom seduce with mimicked “goodness,” “pitiableness” and “kindness” despite their swarthiness, homeliness and true wickedness. Regardless, we can be sure the “beauty of Cupid” like the “beauty of Adonis” accounts, to a large degree, for the successful transmission of this cult.
Apuleius’ tale ends with a feast among the Gods upon Olympus. There Psyche, whom had fallen from Cupid’s favor, is reunited with the God and granted immortality. In other words, whereas the Semitic Pluto carries off the Aryan Kore into the dark underworld, Cupid, ostensibly, gradually seduces Psyche to sunny Olympus. Yet the tale is profoundly deceptive and must be regarded JEM.
Indeed, in some important and perhaps seminal way, we see the Semitic underworld, Eleusinian Mysteries and Bacchanalia reset in the Aryan Heavens. Christianity will continue this inversion. Eros becomes the ingratiated, king-favored Semite or Jew seducing the desired Aryan stock by clothing himself in an Aryan setting of affluence. One perhaps sees here even the description of and instruction for a kind of “pick-up game” that may even be descriptive of behavior in “mystery cults” such as the Eleusinian Mysteries.
Psyche is prevented from beholding her wealthy suitor despite becoming sexually involved with him. Likely this is a metaphor for a Jewish or proto-Jewish crypsis. In other words, here her suitor has not revealed himself as a Semite. Later Psyche is rejected by Cupid for violating this agreement and must abide a series or trials and punishments before being reunited with him. This also appears to depict, excuse the pun, “psychological manipulation.” Here the Aryan women has already formed a sexual attachment, the Semite plays aloof to ensure she doesn’t develop a sense of superiority, to degrade and ensure his catch. This is “game,” the opposite of “White Knighting.”
Ostensibly there is a happy ending to the tale. Psyche’s child by Cupid is not the terrible dragon the Apollonian Oracle prophesized, which would, again, be a synonym for the Semitic Bacchus. Or is he? Their child is Voluptas or Hedone, “pleasure.” The word Hedonism of course derives from Hedone. Thus it is true, the darkness did conceal a monster.
What should be made absolutely clear to us is that the concept of Psyche or Spirit through the ages has retained its meaning. It means, simply, “the desired Aryan female stock.” Indeed, this remains true even if the word Spirit, for instance, was almost always misunderstood by the people who spoke it, particularly after the rise of Christianity. Jewish esotericist, however, as our study of JEM reveals, have retained the correct understanding. This is understanding “Logos” or rather simply knowing what words actually mean!
Here we understand that early Christianity was a carefully disguised pursuit of “the Holy Spirit,” Aryan women or Aryan genes. In this manner Psyche becomes a direct synonym for “Prometheus’ fire” and Minerva’s “Breath of Life” that animates the first man, both also metaphorical references to Aryan genetics. Here we understand that the main of Greek Philosophy, with its obsession with Spirit, was equally concerned with this interest in Aryan genes, even if they had often denied the nature of their pursuit to themselves, making this symbol and their pursuit ever more abstract, sublimated and effective. Doubtlessly, here we find many unconscious Josephs and Sussmen among a few Gnostics or “knowers.” Of course, it all seems so obvious now, after all, what pursuit of men might be said not to be, ultimately, in pursuit of the beautiful Psyche?
Here though we must understand the most important aspect of this metaphor. Women are the “Spirit” or “Psyche” of Aryans. When they are seduced by the Semitic Cupid, abducted, like Kore by the Semitic Pluto, become madwomen in Bacchus’ train or are severed away from Uranus by the Semitic Saturn, Aryan man is literally “dispirited.” The world is given over to Bacchus or the Dragon named “Hedonism.” The Semite, or any of the other sexually competitive non-whites, on the other hand, may not be dispirited by degenerate conditions, because they never possessed “The Spirit” to begin with, hence degenerate conditions mean merely the opportunity to possess it. Degeneracy is to Jews “spiriting,” joyful. The reason for this we now understand.
At last as well the term psychology is revealed to us. In the hands of Jews it is nothing more than the prodding of the Aryan mind for weakness to use against him, to dispirit him, weaken him. Ultimately “psychology” as it developed in the 19th century was merely the newest way of “extracting the Aryan soul,” to wit, his women, as Christianity become transparently false, even if its full meaning and design are only now being divined. From our perspective the term “psychology” is nearly obsolete. There is no “psychology.” There is AIM and Interpretation Romana. There is our Religion.
When a man knows he has access to and the devotion of a beautiful Aryan women —Psyche— he is “spirited,” jovial, healthy, dominant, confident, overpowering. He is with spirit, he has a soul. Likewise he has obtained biological continuance of the highest type. He has a way to “heaven.” To the top of the genetic human pyramid, to Olympus, “Eden,” weighed down only by his own impurity, to the extent he is not more Aryan himself. We understand clearly here that this understanding “moralizes” the Aryan woman as well.
Aryans are “spiritual,” “spirited” and energized to the extent they understand they have the fealty of Aryan women, then all things are possible, yes, the conquest of the heavens and the immortality of the species, Godhood. The “basic” is in order. His tremendous genius and energies may now be focused, unwaveringly, on things hitherto unimaginable.
But any race is likewise moralized, made spirited by either the possession of “Psyche,” again Aryan woman, or by her possible or impending possession. Again, here we see the motivations for non-White incursions into Aryan lands. Muslims and Jews are “spiritual people” only because they seek “the Spirit” or “Houri.” When an Orthodox Jew talks of Jews possessing “souls” and Aryans being devoid of it, he expresses confidence and speaks a wistful prophesy: Jews have access to Aryans with impunity.
East Asians, one jokes are, “soulless” and it is relatively true. An aged race, they are little energized and compelled in their pursuit of beautiful Psyche. On the other hand, they are happy to colonize any land where a generous “spirit” provides. Negroes, we have been assured by a Jewish media, especially “have soul.” Indeed, they are even animated to make the laziest, most “improvisational,” most chaotic and debased mating music the world has ever known. By this we know they have “soul” or at least, desperately desire it. In this case, it was a soul, either never gained or long ago lost.
Let us not be disappointed that soul means “simply” Aryan woman. Rather suddenly appears the most truly romantic notion every imagined. We do believe in “soul mates.” Art and Religion exists in its positive form to cement and ameliorate this union. Again, Psyche is controlled by Art and Religion. As an Artist and Myth Creator you are the Psychopomp. Indeed, as all roles Mercury or any of the Gods perform, Apollo performs it better. Art, the Lyre, leads better than the Caduceus.
7 thoughts on ““The Spirit” and Seducing the Aryan Psyche”
My only discrepancy is that this book keeps saying that the Jew takes the choicest or best Aryan females, id counter and day they attempt but are usually not successful, I see Jews with fat blonde women because they think they got a big win. Most of the Taylor Swifts out there are not dating a Jew. If true Jews wouldn’t still look like goblins.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Aryans traits tend to be recessive. It’s estimated Jews owe roughly half their genetics to a primarily female European line. As far as appearance, this seems to square. Obviously individual Jews are not aways sexually successful or with the most desirable women. However their Religion tends to place them in a competitive position versus declining and demoralized Aryan populations.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mark, I know this is off topic but have you read ‘The Myth of the 20th Century’?
I was reading it last night to see Rosenberg mentioning that Hermes was a Semitic god that infiltrated the Greek Pantheon.
I really enjoy your work and hope to be contributing to your effort financially very soon. I believe you’re on to something here of real importance. Thank you and Hail Apollo.
Lukas, I’ve read neither Oliver nor Rosenberg, despite both being recommended to me and understanding them to have treated similar topics. I have always been interested in approaching this with fresh eyes. Jews indicate the element of fire, fire Gods and Mercury as Jewish in contemporary JEM, even Yuri Slezkine hints at the Jewishness of Mercury with his concept of the Mecurian and Apollonian. More though, the attributes of these Gods clearly indicate them as Semitic, especially when contrasted with the God Apollo. That being said, if you have book names and page numbers you can site, please send them. I will check them out and include them as corroborating sources if it looks good.
Unfortunately my focus right now is on editing my researched works. My thesis of Promethean transmission or the idea of proto-Jews sounds hinted at in Oliver and Rosenberg. These concepts lend great coherency to the understanding of ancient myth and symbolism. The rigid “Bowdlerization thesis” that appears among Rightists, appears out of a strange, jealous vanity that wishes to take credit even for things that clearly appear deleterious. As it concerns Zoroaster, I believe many in the right are confused by Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra. But there Nietzsche is actually attempting to correct an error and reinvent Zarathustra. Jason Jorjani added confusion here as well including with the figures of Prometheus and Atlas, both whom I identify as Semitic.
Man!, they never taught mythology like this when I was in school.
LikeLiked by 1 person