R.E.M Part II: A.I.M versus J.E.M

Racial Esoteric Moralization, as we will define it, is the phenomenon of infusing story and myth with a racial subtext so as to inspire health and boldness in one’s own people whilst demoralizing an adversarial group. The use of the acronym REM, in lieu of the full expression, may help to soften the expression, at least as we consider its usage in the short term.

With the acronym REM, a fortuitous reference, metaphor, and mnemonic appears. Indeed, as the reader is likely aware the same acronym also refers to the unconscious dream state or Rapid Eye Movement sleep. Likewise Racial Esoteric Moralization is the process of “incepting” a person’s dreams and motivations, subliminally, into their “sleeping mind” or subconscious, even while they are awake.

The essentially Semitic Mercury, the shepherd and priest, and the Aryan Apollo, the shepherd and artist, are also understood as Gods of Dreams. Hence the Aryan artist comes to understand himself as Apollo implanting REM is his audience, much as Jewish esotericists have frequently considered themselves akin to Mercury as the JEM we review will reveal. Here, the word Moralization conveys both senses of the word: it describes art and communication designed to embolden and also to morally justify or support.

The more ancient notion of REM can be found in terms like “to bless” or “to curse.” Indeed, where REM functions to embolden its racial kin it “blesses,” where it seeks to demoralize (Racial Esoteric Demoralization) it “curses.” In this study we will come to realize that Jewish Esotericist, particularly in the critically important case of Christianity, have developed apparent “blessings” that were in some final sense “curses.” Such is often the nature of RED. And here we understand that stories are, indeed, magic spells. In Old English, the word spell means, indeed, a “story, saying, tale, history, narrative, fable; discourse, command.” REM myths are spells that contain a people’s morals i.e. “the moral of the story.” Again, they are spells with the power to transform whole peoples.

Where REM appears in Jewish works, toward Jewish racial ends, we will call it Jewish Esoteric Moralization or JEM. Since it is a phenomenon that also appears among Aryan works of art, albeit tragically little of late, we shall craft the term Apollonian or Aryan Inner Moralization. Hence one may refer to particular instances of REM in Artistic or Religious works as JEM or AIM. While both can be admired for clever artistry and, in some cases, JEM may be studied and even, in some dimensions, imitated— only one of the two have positive value for our people.

Indeed, we develop, promote, continue and allow work that has “an AIM.” By this understanding alone do we even permit ourselves Art and Religion. Hence even works that are shown ambivalent or “agnostic” may be called purposeless or “AIM”less. This is true while acknowledging an “appearance” of ambivalence may sometimes be given to works when one’s race is not yet in power or as a subtler, gentler more refined form of AIM. On the other hand, we are obligated to make the appearance of AIM “sacred.” This was the secret to the Apollonian Religion. The Art and Religion one permits himself, that he considers “canonical”, he must honor as sacred and reject those who desecrate it. Apollo’s role as a God of the Arts and Leader of the Muses speaks to the ancient understanding that the arts are religious, sacred and must be kept “Apollonian.”  This is moralizing.

The terms AID and JED will be used to describe instances of demoralization. For example, “the film Saving Private Ryan contained JED targeted at Aryans, while JEM targeted toward Jews.” On the other hand, “great AID appears in the story of Apollo slaying the Python or Jupiter overthrowing Saturn.” It is true instances of RED are merely the other side of REM. In other words, when one emboldens his own people, he, by definition, demoralizes another. It is dishonest to pretend otherwise. This is why Jews feel it intolerable living among Aryan peoples without changing their culture to their liking. Hence the terms are generally interchangeable. However terms like AID and JED may be used to put a finer point on instances where the demoralization of a racial enemy, as opposed to the moralization of one’s own people, seems emphasized.

Bloye_Apollo_statue_Dudley (1).jpg
Art without A.I.M (Aryan Inner Moralization) is AIMless. 


8 thoughts on “R.E.M Part II: A.I.M versus J.E.M

  1. Demoralization is in a way one of the key features of modern criticism (and it’s almost always JED). I am at university for history in Sweden and criticism is weaponized to a very extreme degree. They even tell us that in order for something to be considered scientific in the curriculum it must be critical. I have been trying to turn this around as something akin to AID. I have unfortunately been using AID more than AIM I feel like, and though I think it is important I think it is ultimately the lesser process. It is really why modernity creates the gulf of nihilism, because modern philosophy is mostly a critique or else Christian moralization which is ultimately JED, but nothing is really given to fill the gulf created (because Christian ethics contribute to the gulf).

    What do you think of the thought that Aryans often idealize the natural environment rather than urban environments, because the Aryan thrives under Darwinian conditions rather than under the comforts of civilization? I have often thought that the part of the ‘modern project’ which was least developed for the Aryan type was the relationship to modern civilization. I say modern because it is particularly characterized by technologies which provide ease and comfort and therefore reduce the conditions of Darwinian selection. I have also wondered if many on the Right are libertarians not because they truly want a degenerate freedom to do anything but because they want to clear a ground in which partly they can prove themselves by their natural instincts and prowess and partly to create a realm where the protection and limitation of demoralization regulations isn’t hindering their potential while supporting unfit types (also eg. opposition to the welfare state).


    1. I think it is normal and healthy that we would be attracted to the forest. Myth understands us as “the first man” emerging from the wood to establish civilization. So part of this is a sort of racial nostalgia. Nevertheless, it’ll remain sacred to us in a good sense. However we are obligated to dominate the urban environment – and important Greco-Roman developments in Art and Religion addressed problems related to urbanization, especially competition with non-Aryans. It’s a matter of distilling and perfecting these energies eventually. In the short term, it is about practicing AIM in art and in life more broadly. I call this “dawning.” See the glossary. After all we are tasked with saving civilization, continuing progress, putting the seasons in chains that WE control.


      1. I would very much appreciate a pointer in the direction of the developments in Religion of the Greeks and Romans to address urbanization. This is one of the central problems I’ve been working with.

        As I see it, the current mastery of JEM/JED is largely related to its control of the contemporary urban environment. Modern education is largely sedentary, as opposed to centred around the palaestra. Modern cities are centres of commerce and promotes the ideal of atomized egoism as well as mindless distraction and unhealthy and excessive consumption. Conversely it is through capitalizing off these degeneracies and the heedless destruction of traditional communities that one rises to the top.

        It is also in the realm of mastering the urban environment that the novel had become so powerful for JEM/JED (and I’m including Christianity here). Skipping forward to arguably the most degenerate period of novelistic art, the modernist period, the form is suddenly dominated by Jews in Europe (Hermann Broch, Alfred Döblin, Italo Svevo – real name Aron Ettore Schmitz, Alfred Schnitzler, etc.) even non-Jewish writers like James Joyce, who wholeheartedly embraced the degeneracy, converted the Ulysses myth into one of Christian symbolism using a Jewish cuckholded character for Odysseus and making him a surrogate father for the Christian artist figure.

        The reason that the novel is important is that it allows a flexibility and adaptibility to circumstances and the ability to deal with the concrete reality through its unique access to realism. It makes it an ideal training ground and tool for thinking dynamically and strategically about the world.

        I acknowledge your criticism of the term ‘red pill’, but if you will allow it for a short form in this instance, it was by reading through the development of the novel that I first became red pilled. I could not get past the fact that something had gone wrong right around the interwar period and directly after the second World War literature was never the same. I kept coming back to this period to ask what had happened here in the European psyche…


      2. Excellent stuff, my friend. We can redeem the novel through AIM. The parabolic forms especially are the most important. In the Greco-Roman milieu, the dominance of Aryans was shown especially through temples, Religion and art dedicated to Zeus or Jupiter. The cult of Apollo, likely a reactionary cult I argue, would for periods develop as a eugenics cult. Until we can return to an open veneration of the racial archetypes, and assert relatively explicit dominance over urban spaces, I recommend “God-Masking” in AIM laden Art. These three articles below develop thoughts I express here:




        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s